This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62008TN0448
Case T-448/08: Action brought on 29 September 2008 — FIFA v OHIM — Ferrero (WORLD CUP 2006 GERMANY)
Case T-448/08: Action brought on 29 September 2008 — FIFA v OHIM — Ferrero (WORLD CUP 2006 GERMANY)
Case T-448/08: Action brought on 29 September 2008 — FIFA v OHIM — Ferrero (WORLD CUP 2006 GERMANY)
SL C 313, 6.12.2008, p. 52–52
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
6.12.2008 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 313/52 |
Action brought on 29 September 2008 — FIFA v OHIM — Ferrero (WORLD CUP 2006 GERMANY)
(Case T-448/08)
(2008/C 313/92)
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Parties
Applicant: Fédération Internationale de Football Association (FIFA) (Zurich, Switzerland) (represented by: D. Alexander QC, A. Barav, Barrister, R. Buchel and C. Rassmann, lawyers)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Ferrero OHG mbH (Stadtallendorf, Germany)
Form of order sought
|
— |
Annul, in whole or in part, the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 30 June 2008 in case R 1470/2005-1; and |
|
— |
Order OHIM to pay the costs. |
Pleas in law and main arguments
Registered Community trade mark subject of the application for a declaration of invalidity: The word mark ‘WORLD CUP 2006 GERMANY’ for goods and services in classes 1, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 11, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 25, 28, 29, 30, 32, 35, 36, 37, 38, 41 and 42 — Community trade mark registration No 2 047 843
Proprietor of the Community trade mark: The applicant
Party requesting the declaration of invalidity of the Community trade mark: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Decision of the Cancellation Division: Rejection of the application for a declaration of invalidity
Decision of the Board of Appeal: Annulment of the decision of the Cancellation Division
Pleas in law: (i) Infringement of Article 73 and 74(1) of Council Regulation No 40/94 in so far as the Board of Appeal has based, largely, its decision on Article 7(1)(c) of Council Regulation No 40/94, a provision which was neither invoked by the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal, nor relied upon by the Cancellation Division; (ii) Alternatively, infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Council Regulation No 40/94 as the Board of Appeal failed to consider the registered Community trade mark subject of the application for a declaration of invalidity as a whole, through the eyes of the average consumer and to apply the relevant law relating to the assessment of descriptiveness of the goods and/or services applied for; and (iii) Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Council Regulation No 40/94 as the Board of Appeal erred in its finding that the registered Community trade mark subject of the application for a declaration of invalidity was devoid of the necessary distinctive character.