Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62007TN0277

Case T-277/07: Action brought on 20 July 2007 — Secure Computing v OHIM — Investronica (SECUREOS)

SL C 235, 6.10.2007, p. 14–14 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

6.10.2007   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 235/14


Action brought on 20 July 2007 — Secure Computing v OHIM — Investronica (SECUREOS)

(Case T-277/07)

(2007/C 235/25)

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Applicant: Secure Computing Corporation (Minnesota, United States) (represented by: H. P. Kunz-Hallstein and R. Kunz-Hallstein, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Investronica, SA

Form of order sought

annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 25 April 2007 in Case R 1063/2006-1;

order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: The applicant.

Community trade mark concerned: The word mark ‘SECUREOS’ for goods in Class 9 (Application No 2 659 944).

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Investronica, S.A.

Mark or sign cited in opposition: The word mark ‘SECUREURO’ (Community trade mark No 2 126 290) for goods and services in Classes 7, 9, 16, 35, 36, 37 and 42 and the figurative mark ‘secureuro’ (Community trade mark No 2 418 135) for goods and services in Classes 7, 9, 16, 35 and 36.

Decision of the Opposition Division: Grant of the opposition and rejection of the application.

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissal of the appeal.

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1), Article 73 and Article 74(1), in fine, of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (1).


(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20 December 1993 on the Community trade mark (OJ 1994 L 11, p. 1).


Top