30.7.2013   

HR

Službeni list Europske unije

C 217/33

(1)

On 26 March 2010, the European Council agreed to the Commission’s proposal to launch a new strategy for jobs and growth, Europe 2020, based on enhanced coordination of economic policies, which focuses on the key areas where action is needed to boost Europe’s potential for sustainable growth and competitiveness.

(2)

On 13 July 2010, the Council adopted a recommendation on the broad guidelines for the economic policies of the Member States and the Union (2010 to 2014) and, on 21 October 2010, it adopted a decision on guidelines for the employment policies of the Member States (2), which together form the ‘integrated guidelines’. Member States were invited to take the integrated guidelines into account in their national economic and employment policies.

(3)

On 29 June 2012, the Member States’ Heads of State or Government decided on a Compact for Growth and Jobs, providing a coherent framework for action at national, EU and euro area levels using all possible levers, instruments and policies. They decided on action to be taken at the level of the Member States, in particular expressing full commitment to achieving the objectives of the Europe 2020 strategy and to implementing the country-specific recommendations.

(4)

On 10 July 2012, the Council adopted a Recommendation (3) on Germany’s National Reform Programme for 2012 and delivered its opinion on Germany’s Stability Programme for 2012-2016.

(5)

On 28 November 2012, the Commission adopted the Annual Growth Survey, marking the start of the 2013 European Semester of economic policy coordination. Also on 28 November 2012, the Commission, on the basis of Regulation (EU) No 1176/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 November 2011 on the prevention and correction of macroeconomic imbalances (4), adopted the second Alert Mechanism Report, in which Germany was not identified as one of the Member States for which an in-depth review would be carried out.

(6)

The European Parliament has been duly involved in the European Semester, in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1466/97, and, on 7 February 2013, adopted a resolution on employment and social aspects in the Annual Growth Survey 2013 and a resolution on the contribution to the Annual Growth Survey 2013.

(7)

On 14 March 2013, the European Council endorsed the priorities for ensuring financial stability, fiscal consolidation and action to foster growth. It underscored the need to pursue differentiated, growth-friendly fiscal consolidation, to restore normal lending conditions to the economy, to promote growth and competitiveness, to tackle unemployment and the social consequences of the crisis, and to modernise public administration.

(8)

On 12 April 2013, Germany submitted its 2013 National Reform Programme and, on 17 April 2013, its Stability Programme for the period 2012-2017. In order to take account of their interlinkages, the two Programmes have been assessed at the same time.

(9)

Based on the assessment of the Stability Programme pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1466/97, the Council is of the opinion that public finances in Germany have been overall sound and the medium-term budgetary objective (MTO) has been achieved. The macroeconomic scenario underpinning the budgetary projections in the Programme is plausible. The Stability Programme’s macroeconomic projections are broadly in line with the Commission services 2013 spring forecast as regards the pace and pattern of economic growth in 2013 and 2014 as well as with the Commission’s estimate of Germany’s medium-term potential growth rate. The objective of the budgetary strategy outlined in the Stability Programme is to ensure continued achievement of the MTO. The Stability Programme confirms the previous MTO of -0,5 % of GDP. The MTO is in line with the requirements of the Stability and Growth Pact. Germany achieved a structural budgetary surplus and, hence, the MTO in 2012. According to the Stability Programme, the (recalculated) (5) structural balance will remain positive in 2013 and 2014, which is broadly in line with the Commission services 2013 spring forecast and has, consequently, created space for automatic stabilisers to play freely. Germany also complied with the expenditure benchmark of the Stability and Growth Pact in 2012. According to the information provided in the Stability Programme, the growth rate of government expenditure, net of discretionary revenue measures, would exceed the expenditure benchmark in 2013 while respecting it in 2014. According to the Stability Programme, gross debt is planned to fall to 80½ % of GDP in 2013 and to remain on a downward path thereafter.

Following the correction of the excessive deficit in 2011, Germany is in a transitional period regarding compliance with the debt criterion and made sufficient progress towards compliance with the debt criterion in 2012. If the Stability Programme is implemented as planned, it is also making sufficient progress towards compliance with the debt criterion in 2013 and the debt benchmark will be met at the end of the transitional period in 2014. Overall, the deficit and debt targets appear realistic.

(10)

Germany has made only limited efforts to improve the efficiency of public spending on healthcare and long-term care. Past reform efforts in the health sector as well as this year’s reform of long-term care appear insufficient to contain expected future cost increases. Germany appears on track with respect to the national target on education and research expenditure but should envisage even more ambitious follow-up targets with a view to catching up with the most innovative economies.

(11)

Germany is not sufficiently tapping growth-friendly revenue sources. The application of the reduced VAT rate, currently at 7 %, to what is now quite a wide range of goods and services could be narrowed and VAT administration reviewed in an effort to increase efficiency, improve tax collection and fight fraud. Revenues from recurrent property taxes are particularly low in Germany, standing at 0,5 % of GDP in 2011 as opposed to 1,3 % in the EU-27. This may leave room for increasing revenues from the municipal real estate tax (Grundsteuer), in particular by reassessing the tax base.

(12)

There has been some progress in the implementation of the constitutional balanced-budget rule (debt brake) since last year’s Recommendation. However, specific implementing rules appear still to be required in most Länder so as to ensure the effective application of the debt brake in the annual budgetary procedure.

(13)

The financial sector has undergone significant adjustment and the regulatory and supervisory framework has been strengthened. Commission state aid decisions have continued to drive the restructuring of Landesbanken. However, there still appear to be governance obstacles to market-driven consolidation in the banking sector, which affect the overall efficiency of the financial sector.

(14)

Germany has taken only limited action to remove significant disincentives faced by second earners and the availability of full time childcare facilities and all-day schools should be further increased. Germany has made some progress in raising the educational achievement of disadvantaged people, but all Länder should continue pursuing ambitious efforts to create a school system that provides equal opportunities for all. Policy action to reduce the high tax wedge for low-wage earners has been limited so far. Measures to integrate the long-term unemployed into the labour market should be enhanced. Germany should do more to reduce the high taxes and social security contributions levied on low wages. Further efforts are needed to improve transition from certain types of contracts, such as mini-jobs, into more sustainable forms of contracts, thus avoiding labour-market segmentation. While real wages are still below their level in the year 2000, which contributed to the structural reduction in the unemployment rate from 8 % to 5,5 %, they have started to grow dynamically since then, without adversely affecting competitiveness. At the same time, wage disparities have increased.

(15)

Germany is aiming at minimising the overall economic costs of transforming the energy system. This has led to some first results but overall costs have continued to increase and major risks and potential inefficiencies remain. Germany is making significant efforts to accelerate the expansion of energy networks. Coordination of its national energy policy with the policies of neighbouring countries is insufficient.

(16)

The situation in the services sectors has not changed significantly since 2012 and there are still restrictions on entering and exercising certain professions. Germany should do more to open up the services sectors by removing unjustified restrictions and barriers to entry, thereby leading to lower price levels and more affordable services for lower income groups. In many craft sectors, including in the construction sector, there is still a requirement to hold a master craftsman’s certificate (Meisterbrief) or an equivalent qualification in order to run a business. The construction sector also faces restrictions as regards commercial communication and authorisation procedures. Many professional services are also subject to legal form and shareholding requirements. Germany could assess whether the same public interest objectives could not be reached with lighter regulation. The diversity of regulatory regimes across Länder also suggests there is scope for further efforts to identify the least burdensome regulatory approaches and extend them throughout the country, thus cutting red tape for businesses. The level of effective competition in the railway sector remains low. Regarding public procurement, the value of the contracts published by German authorities under Union procurement law is significantly low. The legislative process involving the revision of the Act against Competition Restrictions has not yet been concluded. In the retail sector, planning regulations significantly restrict new entries in the market.

(17)

In the context of the European Semester, the Commission has carried out a comprehensive analysis of Germany’s economic policy. It has assessed the National Reform Programme and the Stability Programme. It has taken into account not only their relevance for sustainable fiscal and socioeconomic policy in Germany, but also their compliance with EU rules and guidance, given the need to reinforce the overall economic governance of the Union by providing EU-level input into future national decisions. Its recommendations under the European Semester are reflected in recommendations (1) to (4) below.

(18)

In the light of this assessment, the Council has examined the Stability Programme, and its opinion (6) is reflected in particular in recommendation (1) below.

(19)

In the context of the European Semester the Commission has also carried out an analysis of the economic policy of the euro area as a whole. On this basis, the Council has issued specific recommendations addressed to the Member States whose currency is the euro (7). As a country whose currency is the euro, Germany should also ensure the full and timely implementation of those recommendations,

1.

Preserve a sound fiscal position, as envisaged, which ensures compliance with the MTO over the Programme horizon. Pursue a growth-friendly fiscal policy through additional efforts to enhance the cost-effectiveness of public spending on healthcare and long-term care through better integration of care delivery and a stronger focus on prevention and rehabilitation and independent living. Improve the efficiency of the tax system, in particular by broadening the VAT base and by reassessing the municipal real estate tax base. Use the available scope for increased and more efficient growth-enhancing spending on education and research at all levels of government. Complete the implementation of the debt brake in a consistent manner across all Länder, ensuring that monitoring procedures and correction mechanisms are timely and relevant.

2.

Sustain conditions that enable wage growth to support domestic demand. To this end, reduce high taxes and social security contributions, especially for low-wage earners and raise the educational achievement of disadvantaged people. Maintain appropriate activation and integration measures, especially for the long-term unemployed. Facilitate the transition from non-standard employment such as mini-jobs into more sustainable forms of employment. Take measures to improve incentives to work and the employability of workers, in particular for second earners and low-skilled workers, also with a view to improving their income. To this end, remove disincentives for second earners and further increase the availability of full time childcare facilities and all-day schools.

3.

Improve the coordination of its energy policy with neighbouring countries and keep the overall costs of transforming the energy system to a minimum, in particular, by further reviewing the cost-effectiveness of energy policy instruments designed to achieve renewable energy targets and by continuing efforts to accelerate the expansion of the national and cross-border electricity and gas networks.

4.

Take measures to further stimulate competition in the services sectors, including certain crafts, in particular in the construction sector, and professional services to boost domestic sources of growth. Take urgent action to significantly increase the value of public contracts open to procurement. Adopt and implement the announced legislative reform to improve the enforcement of competition law regarding competition restrictions. Remove planning restrictions which unduly restrict new entries in the retail sector. Take further measures to eliminate the remaining barriers to competition in the railway markets. Pursue efforts for consolidation in the banking sector, including by improving the governance framework.