This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62025TO0375
Order of the President of the General Court of 22 December 2025.
Renate Holzeisen v European Commission.
Interim relief – Medicinal products for human use – Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 – Marketing authorisation for Kostaive-zapomeran – Application for suspension of operation of a measure – No urgency.
Case T-375/25 R.
Order of the President of the General Court of 22 December 2025.
Renate Holzeisen v European Commission.
Interim relief – Medicinal products for human use – Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 – Marketing authorisation for Kostaive-zapomeran – Application for suspension of operation of a measure – No urgency.
Case T-375/25 R.
Court reports – general – 'Information on unpublished decisions' section
ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2025:1128
Order of the President of the General Court of 22 December 2025 –
Holzeisen v Commission
(Case T‑375/25 R)
(Interim relief – Medicinal products for human use – Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 – Marketing authorisation for Kostaive-zapomeran – Application for suspension of operation of a measure – No urgency)
|
1. |
Interim relief – Suspension of operation of a measure – Conditions for granting – Prima facie case – Urgency – Serious and irreparable damage – Cumulative nature – Weighing up of all the interests involved – Order of examination and method of verification – Discretion of the judge hearing the application for interim relief (Arts 256(1), 278 and 279 TFEU; Rules of Procedure of the General Court, Art. 156) (see paragraphs 11, 13, 14) |
|
2. |
Interim relief – Suspension of operation of a measure – Conditions for granting – Urgency – Serious and irreparable damage – Burden of proof – Need to plead the risk of suffering that damage personally (Arts 278 and 279 TFEU; Rules of Procedure of the General Court, Art. 156(4)) (see paragraphs 17, 19, 27, 28) |
|
3. |
Interim relief – Suspension of operation of a measure – Conditions for granting – Urgency – Serious and irreparable damage – Burden of proof – Residual scientific uncertainty as to the existence or scope of risks to human health – Application of the precautionary principle – Scope – Limits – No concrete and precise indications, supported by detailed documentary evidence – Purely hypothetical damage – No urgency (Arts 278 and 279 TFEU; Rules of Procedure of the General Court, Art. 156(4)) (see paragraphs 29-31, 35-37) |
Operative part
|
1. |
The application for interim measures is dismissed. |
|
2. |
The costs are reserved. |