Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62019TO0507

Order of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 25 March 2020.
Arnaldo Lucaccioni v European Commission.
Action for annulment — Civil service — Preparatory act — Action for compensation — Action closely related to the action for annulment — Failure to follow the pre-litigation procedure — Inadmissibility.
Case T-507/19.

Court reports – general – 'Information on unpublished decisions' section

ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2020:118

 Order of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 25 March 2020 –
Lucaccioni v Commission

(Case T‑507/19)

(Action for annulment — Civil service — Preparatory act — Action for compensation — Action closely related to the action for annulment — Failure to follow the pre-litigation procedure — Inadmissibility)

1. 

Actions brought by officials — Act adversely affecting an official — Meaning — Preparatory act — Not included

(Staff Regulations of Officials, Arts 90 and 91)

(see paras 36-41)

2. 

Actions brought by officials — Application for damages linked to an application for annulment — Dismissal of claim for annulment leading to dismissal of the claim for compensation

(Staff Regulations of Officials, Art. 91)

(see para. 51)

3. 

Actions brought by officials — Action for damages brought without a pre-litigation procedure in accordance with the Staff Regulations — Inadmissibility

(Staff Regulations of Officials, Art. 90 and 91)

(see para. 54)

Re:

Application under Article 270 TFEU seeking (i) annulment of the decision of the Commission of 13 September 2018 rejecting the application for the recusal of doctor A, a medical practitioner appointed by the Commission to a medical committee established in the context of a request on the part of the applicant seeking recognition of the aggravation of an occupational disease and (ii) compensation for the harm that the applicant claims to have suffered.

Operative part

1. 

The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. 

Arnaldo Lucaccioni is ordered to pay the costs.
Top