Ovaj je dokument isječak s web-mjesta EUR-Lex
Dokument 62001CJ0186
Judgment of the Court of 11 March 2003.#Alexander Dory v Bundesrepublik Deutschland.#Reference for a preliminary ruling: Verwaltungsgericht Stuttgart - Germany.#Inapplicability of Community law to compulsory military service - Equal treatment of men and women - Article 2 of Directive 76/207/EEC - Compulsory military service in Germany limited to men only - Directive not applicable.#Case C-186/01.
Presuda Suda od 11. ožujka 2003.
Alexander Dory protiv Bundesrepublik Deutschland.
Zahtjev za prethodnu odluku: Verwaltungsgericht Stuttgart - Njemačka.
Predmet C-186/01.
Presuda Suda od 11. ožujka 2003.
Alexander Dory protiv Bundesrepublik Deutschland.
Zahtjev za prethodnu odluku: Verwaltungsgericht Stuttgart - Njemačka.
Predmet C-186/01.
Oznaka ECLI: ECLI:EU:C:2003:146
«(Inapplicability of Community law to compulsory military service – Equal treatment of men and women – Article 2 of Directive 76/207/EEC – Compulsory military service in Germany limited to men only – Directive not applicable)»
|
I - 0000 | |||
|
I - 0000 | |||
(Council Directive 76/207)
JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
11 March 2003 (1)
((Inapplicability of Community law to compulsory military service – Equal treatment of men and women – Article 2 of Directive 76/207/EEC – Compulsory military service in Germany limited to men only – Directive not applicable))
In Case C-186/01, REFERENCE to the Court under Article 234 EC by the Verwaltungsgericht Stuttgart (Germany) for a preliminary ruling in the proceedings pending before that court between Alexander Doryand
Bundesrepublik Deutschland, on the interpretation of Article 2 of Council Directive 76/207/EEC of 9 February 1976 on the implementation of the principle of equal treatment for men and women as regards access to employment, vocational training and promotion, and working conditions (OJ 1976 L 39, p. 40), and, more generally, on the compatibility with Community law of the limitation of compulsory military service in Germany to men,THE COURT,,
after considering the written observations submitted on behalf of:
having regard to the Report for the Hearing,
after hearing the oral observations of Mr Dory, represented by W. Dory and C. Lenz, Rechtsanwälte; the German Government, represented by W.-D. Plessing, assisted by C. Tomuschat, Sachverständiger; the Finnish Government, represented by T. Pynnä; and the Commission, represented by J. Sack, at the hearing on 16 April 2002,
after hearing the Opinion of the Advocate General at the sitting on 28 November 2002,
gives the following
On those grounds,
THE COURT,
in answer to the question referred to it by the Verwaltungsgericht Stuttgart by order of 4 April 2001, hereby rules:
Rodríguez Iglesias |
Puissochet |
Wathelet |
Schintgen |
Timmermans |
Gulmann |
Edward |
Jann |
Skouris |
Macken |
Colneric |
von Bahr |
Cunha Rodrigues |
R. Grass |
G.C. Rodríguez Iglesias |
Registrar |
President |