Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62012TN0288

    Case T-288/12: Action brought on 26 June 2012 — EI du Pont de Nemours v OHIM — Zueco Ruiz (ZYTEL)

    SL C 273, 8.9.2012, p. 13–14 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    Date of document:
    26/06/2012
    Date lodged:
    26/06/2012
    Author:
    Opći sud
    Form:
    Pravosudna informacija
    Authentic language:
    engleski
    Link
    Select all documents mentioning this document
    Instruments cited in case law:
    Link

    8.9.2012   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 273/13

    Action brought on 26 June 2012 — EI du Pont de Nemours v OHIM — Zueco Ruiz (ZYTEL)

    (Case T-288/12)

    2012/C 273/23

    Language in which the application was lodged: English

    Parties

    Applicant: EI du Pont de Nemours and Company (Wilmington, United States) (represented by: E. Armijo Chávarri, lawyer)

    Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

    Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Enrique Zueco Ruiz (Zaragoza, Spain)

    Form of order sought

    —

    Set aside the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 29 March 2012 in case R 464/2011-2; and

    —

    Order that the costs of the proceedings be borne by the defendant.

    Pleas in law and main arguments

    Applicant for a Community trade mark: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

    Community trade mark concerned: The figurative mark ‘ZYTEL’ for goods and services in classes 9, 12 and 37

    Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The applicant

    Mark or sign cited in opposition: Community trade mark registration No 369314, of the word mark ‘ZYTEL’, for goods in classes 1 and 17; Well-known mark ‘ZYTEL’, for goods in classes 1 and 17

    Decision of the Opposition Division: Rejected the opposition in its entirety

    Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal

    Pleas in law: Infringement of Articles 8(1)(b) and Article 8(5) of Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009.

    Top