Back to EUR-Lex homepage

EUR-Lex Access to European Union law

Back to EUR-Lex homepage

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search
You are here

Document 62010FN0017

Case F-17/10: Action brought on 15 March 2010 — Daake v OHIM

SL C 134, 22.5.2010, p. 56–56 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

Date of document:
15/03/2010
Date lodged:
15/03/2010
Author:
Službenički sud
Form:
Pravosudna informacija
Authentic language:
njemački

22.5.2010   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 134/56

Action brought on 15 March 2010 — Daake v OHIM

(Case F-17/10)

2010/C 134/93

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Simone Daake (Alicante, Spain) (represented by: H. Tettenborn, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of OHIM’s decision of 4 December 2009 rejecting the applicant’s claims for compensation

Form of order sought

—

Order OHIM to compensate the applicant for material damage amounting to the difference between:

—

on the one hand, her actual salary according to her formal classification as a member of the contract staff under Article 3a of the Conditions of Employment of other Servants (‘CEOS’) from 1 November 2005 until 31 October 2008 and the unemployment benefits paid to her from 1 November 2008 until today, and

—

on the other hand, the salary to which she was entitled as a member of the temporary staff under Article 2(a) of the CEOS from 1 November 2005 until 31 October 2008 and the unemployment benefits to which she was entitled from 1 November 2008 until today, calculated according to her salary for October 2008 under Article 2(a) of the CEOS –

—

together with the resulting losses to retirement pension and other indemnities, salary and benefits taking into account appropriate promotion based on her performance until 1 April 2008,

—

and — to the extent required in order for the compensation applied for to be granted — annul the decisions of OHIM of 6 May 2009 and 4 December 2009;

—

order OHIM to compensate the applicant for the non-material damage caused by the discrimination vis-à-vis other OHIM employees in an amount to be determined by the Tribunal;

—

order OHIM to pay the costs.
Top