This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62010CN0097
Case C-97/10, Case C-98/10, Case C-99/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal d’Instance de Dax (France) lodged on 22 February 2010 — AG2R Prévoyance v SARL Bourdil — AG2R Prévoyance v SARL Boucalaise de Boulangerie — AG2R Prévoyance v SARL Baba-Pom’
Case C-97/10, Case C-98/10, Case C-99/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal d’Instance de Dax (France) lodged on 22 February 2010 — AG2R Prévoyance v SARL Bourdil — AG2R Prévoyance v SARL Boucalaise de Boulangerie — AG2R Prévoyance v SARL Baba-Pom’
Case C-97/10, Case C-98/10, Case C-99/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal d’Instance de Dax (France) lodged on 22 February 2010 — AG2R Prévoyance v SARL Bourdil — AG2R Prévoyance v SARL Boucalaise de Boulangerie — AG2R Prévoyance v SARL Baba-Pom’
SL C 113, 1.5.2010, p. 29–29
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
- Date of document:
- 22/02/2010
- Date lodged:
- 22/02/2010
- Author:
- Sud
- Form:
- Pravosudna informacija
- Authentic language:
- francuski
- Type of procedure:
- Prethodno pitanje
- Link
- Select all documents mentioning this document
- Case affecting:
-
- request for interpretation 12006E082
- Link
- EUROVOC descriptor:
|
1.5.2010 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 113/29 |
Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal d’Instance de Dax (France) lodged on 22 February 2010 — AG2R Prévoyance v SARL Bourdil — AG2R Prévoyance v SARL Boucalaise de Boulangerie — AG2R Prévoyance v SARL Baba-Pom’
((Case C-97/10) - (Case C-98/10) - (Case C-99/10))
2010/C 113/45
Language of the case: French
Referring court
Tribunal d’Instance de Dax (Landes)
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: AG2R Prévoyance
Defendants: SARL Bourdil, SARL Boucalaise de Boulangerie, SARL Baba-Pom’
Question referred
Does an extensive collective agreement granting an exclusive right to the management of a single scheme for the supplementary reimbursement of healthcare costs (in this case, to AG2R Prévoyance) infringe the provisions of Article 82 of the EC Treaty where that agreement does not provide for and even expressly excludes any waiver of affiliation to that scheme (in so far as the Community competition rules do not obstruct the performance of the tasks assigned to AG2R Prévoyance, entrusted with the scheme)?
