Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62009TN0414

    Case T-414/09: Action brought on 14 October 2009 — Henkel v OHIM — JLO Holding (LIVE)

    SL C 312, 19.12.2009, p. 36–36 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    19.12.2009   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 312/36


    Action brought on 14 October 2009 — Henkel v OHIM — JLO Holding (LIVE)

    (Case T-414/09)

    2009/C 312/59

    Language in which the application was lodged: German

    Parties

    Applicant: Henkel AG & Co. KGaA (Düsseldorf, Germany) (represented by: C. Milbradt, lawyer)

    Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

    Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: JLO Holding Company LLC (Santa Monica, United States of America)

    Form of order sought

    Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 30 July 2009 in case R 609/2008-1 insofar as it made an order for revocation of the Community trade mark No 984 245‘LIVE’ for the goods, soaps, perfumery, cosmetic products and make-up;

    order OHIM to pay the costs.

    Pleas in law and main arguments

    Registered Community trade mark in respect of which a declaration of invalidity has been sought: the word mark ‘LIVE’ for goods in Class 3 (Community trade mark No 984 245)

    Proprietor of the Community trade mark: Henkel AG & Co. KGaA

    Applicant for the declaration of invalidity: JLO Holding Company LLC

    Decision of the Cancellation Division: Partial revocation of the Community trade mark

    Decision of the Board of Appeal: Partial annulment of the Cancellation Division's decision and partial revocation of the Community trade mark

    Pleas in law: Infringement of Articles 51(1)(a) and Article 51(2) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (1), on the ground that it was proved that the trade mark at issue in the proceedings had been used in such a way as to preserve the rights of the proprietor for the product group, soups, perfumery, cosmetic products and make-up


    (1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the Community trade mark (OJ 2009 L 78, p. 1).


    Top