This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62009FA0012
Case F-12/09: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 14 September 2011 — A v Commission (Staff case — Officials — Occupational disease — Relationship between the procedures under Articles 73 and 78 of the Staff Regulations — Provisional allowance — Reimbursement of medical costs — Access to the individual file)
Case F-12/09: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 14 September 2011 — A v Commission (Staff case — Officials — Occupational disease — Relationship between the procedures under Articles 73 and 78 of the Staff Regulations — Provisional allowance — Reimbursement of medical costs — Access to the individual file)
Case F-12/09: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 14 September 2011 — A v Commission (Staff case — Officials — Occupational disease — Relationship between the procedures under Articles 73 and 78 of the Staff Regulations — Provisional allowance — Reimbursement of medical costs — Access to the individual file)
SL C 362, 10.12.2011, p. 22–22
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
10.12.2011 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 362/22 |
Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 14 September 2011 — A v Commission
(Case F-12/09) (1)
(Staff case - Officials - Occupational disease - Relationship between the procedures under Articles 73 and 78 of the Staff Regulations - Provisional allowance - Reimbursement of medical costs - Access to the individual file)
2011/C 362/34
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: A (P., France) (represented by: B. Cambier and A. Paternostre, lawyers)
Defendant: Commission (represented by: J. Currall and J. Baquero Cruz, acting as Agents)
Re:
Application that the Commission be declared liable for certain faults allegedly committed against the applicant in the context of the procedure under Article 73 of the Staff Regulations, and for the annulment of various decisions refusing to apply to the applicant the provisions of Article 73(2)(b) of the Staff Regulations, to communicate to him a series of documents forming part of his medical file and to reimburse him for certain medical costs — Application for damages
Operative part of the judgment
The Tribunal:
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
2. |
Orders the applicant to pay the costs. |
(1) OJ C 113, 16.5.2009, p. 45.