This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62005FA0099
Case F-99/05: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 31 January 2008 — Wilms v Commission (Staff cases — Officials — Promotion — 2004 promotion exercise — Allocation of priority points — Application ratione temporis of provisions of the new staff regulations)
Case F-99/05: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 31 January 2008 — Wilms v Commission (Staff cases — Officials — Promotion — 2004 promotion exercise — Allocation of priority points — Application ratione temporis of provisions of the new staff regulations)
Case F-99/05: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 31 January 2008 — Wilms v Commission (Staff cases — Officials — Promotion — 2004 promotion exercise — Allocation of priority points — Application ratione temporis of provisions of the new staff regulations)
SL C 116, 9.5.2008, p. 31–31
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
9.5.2008 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 116/31 |
Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 31 January 2008 — Wilms v Commission
(Case F-99/05) (1)
(Staff cases - Officials - Promotion - 2004 promotion exercise - Allocation of priority points - Application ratione temporis of provisions of the new staff regulations)
(2008/C 116/57)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: Günter Wilms (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: M. van der Woude and V. Landes, lawyers)
Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: G. Berscheid and V. Joris, agents, and D. Slater, lawyer)
Re:
First, annulment of the decisions awarding promotion points to the applicant in respect of the 2004 promotion exercise and, second, annulment of the merit list of Grade A*10 officials promoted to Grade A*11 in the 2004 promotion exercise
Operative part of the judgment
The Tribunal:
1. |
Annuls the decision fixing the total of Mr Wilms' promotion points in the 2004 promotion exercise and the decision refusing him promotion in that exercise. |
2. |
Dismisses the remainder of the action. |
3. |
Orders the Commission of the European Communities to pay the costs. |
(1) OJ C 10, 14.1.2006, p. 25 (Case originally registered at the Court of First Instance of the European Communities under T-386/05 and transferred to the European Union Civil Service Tribunal by order of 15 December 2005).