EUR-Lex Access to European Union law

Back to EUR-Lex homepage

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document C2005/217/87

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 6 July 2005 in Case T-148/04 TQ3 Travel Solutions Belgium SA v Commission of the European Communities (Public service contracts — Community tendering procedure — Provision of travel agency services for travel undertaken by officials and agents of the institutions)

IO C 217, 3.9.2005, p. 39–39 (ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, NL, PL, PT, SK, SL, FI, SV)

3.9.2005   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 217/39


JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 6 July 2005

in Case T-148/04 TQ3 Travel Solutions Belgium SA v Commission of the European Communities (1)

(Public service contracts - Community tendering procedure - Provision of travel agency services for travel undertaken by officials and agents of the institutions)

(2005/C 217/87)

Language of the case: French

In Case T-148/04: TQ3 Travel Solutions Belgium SA, established in Mechelen (Belgium), initially represented by R. Ergec and K. Möric, and then by B. Lissoir, lawyers, against Commission of the European Communities (Agents: L. Parpala and E. Manhaeve, with an address for service in Luxembourg), supported by Wagon-Lits Travel SA, established in Brussels (Belgium), represented by F. Herbert and H. Van Peer, lawyers, and D. Harrison, Solicitor, with an address for service in Luxembourg — application both for annulment of the Commission's decisions not to award to the applicant lot No 1 of the contract covered by Notice No 2003/S 143 129409 for the provision of travel agency services but to award that lot to another undertaking and also for damages to compensate for the loss suffered by the applicant following the rejection of its tender — the Court of First Instance (Second Chamber), composed of J. Pirrung, President, N.J. Forwood and S. Papasavvas, Judges; J. Palacio González, Principal Administrator, for the Registrar, gave a judgment on 6 July 2005, in which it:

1.

Dismisses the application;

2.

Orders the applicant to pay the costs incurred by the Commission and the intervener, including those of the proceedings on the application for interim measures.


(1)  OJ C 179, 10.7.2004


Top