Back to EUR-Lex homepage

EUR-Lex Access to European Union law

Back to EUR-Lex homepage

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search
You are here

Document 62005CO0395

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 6 March 2007.
Antonello D'Antonio and Others.
Reference for a preliminary ruling: Tribunale di Viterbo - Italy.
Article 104(3), first subparagraph, of the Rules of Procedure - Freedom of establishment - Freedom to provide services - Rules of competition applicable to undertakings - Interpretation of Articles 31 EC, 43 EC, 49 EC and 86 EC - Games of chance - Collection of bets on sporting events - Licensing requirement - Exclusion of certain operators by reason of their type of corporate form - Requirement of police authorisation - Criminal penalties.
Case C-395/05.

Thuarascálacha na Cúirte Eorpaí 2007 I-00024*

ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:2007:134





Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 6 March 2007 – Criminal proceedings against D’Antonio

(Case C‑395/05)

Article 104(3), first subparagraph, of the Rules of Procedure – Freedom of establishment – Freedom to provide services – Rules of competition applicable to undertakings – Interpretation of Articles 31 EC, 43 EC, 49 EC and 86 EC – Games of chance – Collection of bets on sporting events – Licensing requirement – Exclusion of certain operators by reason of their type of corporate form – Requirement of police authorisation – Criminal penalties

Freedom of movement for persons – Freedom of establishment – Freedom to provide services – Restrictions (Arts 43 EC and 49 EC) (see para. 7, operative part 1-4)

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling – Tribunale di Viterbo – Interpretation of Articles 31, 43, 49 and 81 to 89 EC – National law making exercise of activity of taking bets subject to obtaining authorisation.

Operative part:

 

National legislation which prohibits the pursuit of the activities of collecting, taking, booking and forwarding offers of bets, in particular bets on sporting events, without a licence or a police authorisation issued by the Member State concerned, constitutes a restriction on the freedom of establishment and the freedom to provide services, provided for in Articles 43 EC and 49 EC respectively.

 

It is for the national courts to determine whether, in so far as national legislation limits the number of operators active in the betting and gaming sector, it genuinely contributes to the objective of preventing the exploitation of activities in that sector for criminal or fraudulent purposes.

 

Articles 43 EC and 49 EC must be interpreted as precluding national legislation, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, which excludes – and, moreover, continues to exclude – from the betting and gaming sector operators in the form of companies whose shares are quoted on the regulated markets.

 

Articles 43 EC and 49 EC must be interpreted as precluding national legislation, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, which imposes a criminal penalty on persons such as the defendants in the main proceedings for pursuing the organised activity of collecting bets without a licence or a police authorisation as required under the national legislation, where those persons were unable to obtain licences or authorisations because that Member State, in breach of Community law, refused to grant licences or authorisations to such persons.

Top