Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document E2015P0024

Request for an Advisory Opinion from the EFTA Court by Fürstliches Obergericht, Liechtenstein, dated 25 September 2015, in the Case of Walter Waller v Liechtensteinische Invalidenversicherung (Case E-24/15)

IO C 457, 8.12.2016, p. 12–12 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

8.12.2016   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 457/12

Request for an Advisory Opinion from the EFTA Court by Fürstliches Obergericht, Liechtenstein, dated 25 September 2015, in the Case of Walter Waller v Liechtensteinische Invalidenversicherung

(Case E-24/15)

(2016/C 457/10)

A request has been made to the EFTA Court by a letter dated 25 September 2015 from Fürstliches Obergericht, Liechtenstein (Princely Court of Appeal, Liechtenstein), which was received at the Court Registry on 1 October 2015, for an Advisory Opinion in the case of Walter Waller v Liechtensteinische Invalidenversicherung, on the following questions:

1.

Does the fact that under the second sentence of Article 87(2) of Regulation (EC) No 987/2009 the debtor institution shall be bound by the findings of the institution of the place of stay or residence preclude the debtor institution from challenging those findings – and thus the information stated in the detailed medical report provided in form E 213 – in its procedure?

2.

If the answer to the first question is in the affirmative: Does that binding effect also apply in court proceedings which, under national procedural rules, follow on from the proceedings before a debtor institution?
Top