This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document E2010J0013
Order of the Court of 31 January 2011 in Case E-13/10 — Aleris Ungplan AS v EFTA Surveillance Authority (Refusal of the EFTA Surveillance Authority to commence proceedings for alleged failure of an EEA State to fulfil its obligations in the field of procurement — Actionable measures — Admissibility)
Order of the Court of 31 January 2011 in Case E-13/10 — Aleris Ungplan AS v EFTA Surveillance Authority (Refusal of the EFTA Surveillance Authority to commence proceedings for alleged failure of an EEA State to fulfil its obligations in the field of procurement — Actionable measures — Admissibility)
Order of the Court of 31 January 2011 in Case E-13/10 — Aleris Ungplan AS v EFTA Surveillance Authority (Refusal of the EFTA Surveillance Authority to commence proceedings for alleged failure of an EEA State to fulfil its obligations in the field of procurement — Actionable measures — Admissibility)
IO C 141, 12.5.2011, p. 12–12
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
12.5.2011 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 141/12 |
ORDER OF THE COURT
of 31 January 2011
in Case E-13/10
Aleris Ungplan AS v EFTA Surveillance Authority
(Refusal of the EFTA Surveillance Authority to commence proceedings for alleged failure of an EEA State to fulfil its obligations in the field of procurement — Actionable measures — Admissibility)
2011/C 141/12
In Case E-13/10: Aleris Ungplan AS v EFTA Surveillance Authority — APPLICATION under the second paragraph of Article 36 of the Agreement between the EFTA States on the Establishment of a Surveillance Authority and a Court of Justice for annulment of the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s Decision No 248/10/COL of 21 June 2010 on procurement for youth care services in Norway, the Court, composed of: Carl Baudenbacher, President, Thorgeir Örlygsson (Judge-Rapporteur), and Per Christiansen, Judges, gave order of 31 January 2011, the operative part of which is as follows:
|
1. |
The application is dismissed as inadmissible. |
|
2. |
The applicant bears the costs of the proceedings. |