Back to EUR-Lex homepage

EUR-Lex Access to European Union law

Back to EUR-Lex homepage

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search
You are here

Document C2007/283/70

Case T-380/07: Action brought on 25 September 2007 — Kaloudis v OHIM — Fédération Française de Tennis (Roland Garros SPORTSWEAR)

IO C 283, 24.11.2007, p. 39–39 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

24.11.2007   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 283/39

Action brought on 25 September 2007 — Kaloudis v OHIM — Fédération Française de Tennis (Roland Garros SPORTSWEAR)

(Case T-380/07)

(2007/C 283/70)

Language in which the application was lodged: French

Parties

Applicant: Dimitrios Kaloudis (Dassia-Corfu, Greece) (represented by: G. Kaloudis, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Fédération Française de Tennis

Form of order sought

—

Annul the Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 19 July 2007;

—

Allow the application for the Community trade mark Roland Garros SPORTSWEAR No 3114477 for Class 25;

—

Order the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: the applicant.

Community trade mark concerned: figurative mark ‘Roland Garros SPORTSWEAR’ for goods in Class 25 — application No 3114477.

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Fédération Française de Tennis

Mark or sign cited in opposition: national mark ‘Roland Garros’ for goods in Classes 3, 16, 18, 22, 25, 28, 32, 41 and 42.

Decision of the Opposition Division: opposition upheld for all the goods in dispute.

Decision of the Board of Appeal: appeal brought by the applicant deemed not filed by reason of the late payment of the appeal fee.

Top