This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document C2006/326/122
Case T-32/05: Order of the Court of First Instance of 18 October 2006 — Staelen v Parliament (Officials — Enforcement of a judgment of the Court of First Instance — No need to adjudicate — Action for damages — No pre-litigation procedure — No direct link — Manifestly inadmissible)
Case T-32/05: Order of the Court of First Instance of 18 October 2006 — Staelen v Parliament (Officials — Enforcement of a judgment of the Court of First Instance — No need to adjudicate — Action for damages — No pre-litigation procedure — No direct link — Manifestly inadmissible)
Case T-32/05: Order of the Court of First Instance of 18 October 2006 — Staelen v Parliament (Officials — Enforcement of a judgment of the Court of First Instance — No need to adjudicate — Action for damages — No pre-litigation procedure — No direct link — Manifestly inadmissible)
IO C 326, 30.12.2006, p. 57–57
(ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, NL, PL, PT, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
30.12.2006 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 326/57 |
Order of the Court of First Instance of 18 October 2006 — Staelen v Parliament
(Case T-32/05) (1)
(Officials - Enforcement of a judgment of the Court of First Instance - No need to adjudicate - Action for damages - No pre-litigation procedure - No direct link - Manifestly inadmissible)
(2006/C 326/122)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: Claire Staelen (Bridel, Luxembourg) (represented by: J. Choucroun, lawyer)
Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: J. de Wachter and M. Mustapha-Pacha, Agents)
Re:
First, annulment of the decision of the Selection Board in Competition EUR/A/151/98, reopened following the judgment of the Court of First Instance of 5 March 2003 in Case T-24/01 Staelen v Parliament [2005] ECR-SC I-A-79 and II-423, not to enter the applicant in the reserve list for that competition and, second, a claim for damages
Operative part of the order
|
1. |
Declares that there is no longer any need to adjudicate on the claims for annulment. |
|
2. |
Rejects the claim for damages. |
|
3. |
Orders the Parliament to pay its own costs and two thirds of the costs incurred by the applicant. |