This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document C2005/132/51
Order of the Court of First Instance of 19 January 2005 in Case T-372/03 Yves Mahieu v Commission of the European Communities (Officials — Time-limits for complaints and actions — Implied rejection of the complaint — Inadmissibility)
Order of the Court of First Instance of 19 January 2005 in Case T-372/03 Yves Mahieu v Commission of the European Communities (Officials — Time-limits for complaints and actions — Implied rejection of the complaint — Inadmissibility)
Order of the Court of First Instance of 19 January 2005 in Case T-372/03 Yves Mahieu v Commission of the European Communities (Officials — Time-limits for complaints and actions — Implied rejection of the complaint — Inadmissibility)
IO C 132, 28.5.2005, p. 28–28
(ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, NL, PL, PT, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
28.5.2005 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 132/28 |
ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
of 19 January 2005
in Case T-372/03 Yves Mahieu v Commission of the European Communities (1)
(Officials - Time-limits for complaints and actions - Implied rejection of the complaint - Inadmissibility)
(2005/C 132/51)
Language of the case: French
In Case T-372/03: Yves Mahieu, official of the Commission of the European Communities, residing in Auderghem (Belgium), represented by L. Vogel, lawyer, against Commission of the European Communities (Agents: J. Currall and H. Krämer, with an address for service in Luxembourg), — application for, firstly, the annulment of the decisions implicitly rejecting the claim brought by the applicant on 29 October 2002 against the decision of the Commission of 6 August 2002 rejecting his request made on the basis of Articles 24 and 90(1) of the Staff Regulations in connection with the mental harassment which he allegedly suffered and, secondly, damages — the Court of First Instance (Fifth Chamber), composed of M. Vilaras, President, F. Dehousse and D. Šváby, Judges; H. Jung, Registrar, made an order on 19 January 2005, the operative part of which is as follows:
|
1. |
The action is dismissed as inadmissible; |
|
2. |
Each party shall bear its own costs. |