EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62021TN0747
Case T-747/21: Action brought on 26 November 2021 — Borussia VfL 1900 Mönchengladbach v EUIPO — Neng (Fohlenelf)
Case T-747/21: Action brought on 26 November 2021 — Borussia VfL 1900 Mönchengladbach v EUIPO — Neng (Fohlenelf)
Case T-747/21: Action brought on 26 November 2021 — Borussia VfL 1900 Mönchengladbach v EUIPO — Neng (Fohlenelf)
IO C 37, 24.1.2022, p. 52–53
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
24.1.2022 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 37/52 |
Action brought on 26 November 2021 — Borussia VfL 1900 Mönchengladbach v EUIPO — Neng (Fohlenelf)
(Case T-747/21)
(2022/C 37/68)
Language in which the application was lodged: German
Parties
Applicant: Borussia VfL 1900 Mönchengladbach GmbH (Mönchengladbach, Germany) (represented by: R. Kitzberger, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: David Neng (Brüggen, Germany)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant
Trade mark at issue: EU word mark ‘Fohlenelf’ — EU trade mark No 12 246 898
Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 28 September 2021 in Case R 2126/2020-4
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
|
— |
annul the contested decision; |
|
— |
order EUIPO to pay the costs of the proceedings and the costs of the applicant, including the costs incurred in the previous proceedings. |
Pleas in law
|
— |
Infringement of Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
|
— |
Infringement of Article 94(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
|
— |
Infringement of Article 97(1)(d) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |