This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62020TN0351
Case T-351/20: Action brought on 5 June 2020 — St. Hippolyt v EUIPO — Raisioaqua (Vital like nature)
Case T-351/20: Action brought on 5 June 2020 — St. Hippolyt v EUIPO — Raisioaqua (Vital like nature)
Case T-351/20: Action brought on 5 June 2020 — St. Hippolyt v EUIPO — Raisioaqua (Vital like nature)
IO C 247, 27.7.2020, p. 47–48
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
27.7.2020 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 247/47 |
Action brought on 5 June 2020 — St. Hippolyt v EUIPO — Raisioaqua (Vital like nature)
(Case T-351/20)
(2020/C 247/65)
Language in which the application was lodged: German
Parties
Applicant: St. Hippolyt Holding GmbH (Dielheim, Deutschland) (represented by M. Gail, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Raisioaqua Oy (Raisio, Finland)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Applicant
Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union trade mark ‘Vital like nature’ — Application No 17 165 002
Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 9 March 2020 in Case R 1279/2020-2
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
|
— |
annul the contested decision; |
|
— |
order EUIPO to pay the costs. |
Plea in law
|
— |
Infringement of Art. 60(1)(a) read in conjunction with Art. 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |