EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62020TN0329
Case T-329/20: Action brought on 29 May 2020 — 4B Company v EUIPO — Deenz (Pendants (jewellery))
Case T-329/20: Action brought on 29 May 2020 — 4B Company v EUIPO — Deenz (Pendants (jewellery))
Case T-329/20: Action brought on 29 May 2020 — 4B Company v EUIPO — Deenz (Pendants (jewellery))
IO C 247, 27.7.2020, p. 41–42
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
27.7.2020 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 247/41 |
Action brought on 29 May 2020 — 4B Company v EUIPO — Deenz (Pendants (jewellery))
(Case T-329/20)
(2020/C 247/57)
Language in which the application was lodged: Italian
Parties
Applicant: 4B Company Srl (Montegiorgio, Italy) (represented by: G. Brogi, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Deenz Holding Ltd (Dubai, United Arab Emirates)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Proprietor of the design at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Design at issue: Community design No 2 100-0001
Contested decision: Decision of the Third Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 19 March 2020 in Case R 2449/2018-3
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
|
— |
annul the contested decision in so far as it annulled the decision of the Cancellation Division, granted the application to maintain Community design No 21 00-0001 in amended form and allowed the design in amended form to be included on the register and published in the Community Designs Bulletin, and, as a result, confirm the decision of the Cancellation Division of 15 October 2018 in Case ICD 10 654; |
|
— |
order EUIPO to pay the costs. |
Plea in law
|
— |
Infringement and misinterpretation of Article 25(6) of Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002. |