This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62020TB0163
Case T-163/20 R and T-163/20 R II: Order of the President of the General Court of 25 May 2020 — Isopix v Parliament (Application for interim relief — Public supply contracts — Provision of photography services — Application for suspension of operation of a measure — Partial manifest inadmissibility of the main action — Inadmissibility — Urgency — Prima facie case — Balancing of competing interests)
Case T-163/20 R and T-163/20 R II: Order of the President of the General Court of 25 May 2020 — Isopix v Parliament (Application for interim relief — Public supply contracts — Provision of photography services — Application for suspension of operation of a measure — Partial manifest inadmissibility of the main action — Inadmissibility — Urgency — Prima facie case — Balancing of competing interests)
Case T-163/20 R and T-163/20 R II: Order of the President of the General Court of 25 May 2020 — Isopix v Parliament (Application for interim relief — Public supply contracts — Provision of photography services — Application for suspension of operation of a measure — Partial manifest inadmissibility of the main action — Inadmissibility — Urgency — Prima facie case — Balancing of competing interests)
IO C 247, 27.7.2020, p. 15–16
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
27.7.2020 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 247/15 |
Order of the President of the General Court of 25 May 2020 — Isopix v Parliament
(Case T-163/20 R and T-163/20 R II)
(Application for interim relief - Public supply contracts - Provision of photography services - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - Partial manifest inadmissibility of the main action - Inadmissibility - Urgency - Prima facie case - Balancing of competing interests)
(2020/C 247/23)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: Isopix SA (Ixelles, Belgium) (represented by: P. Van den Bulck and J. Fahner, lawyers)
Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: K. Wójcik and E. Taneva, acting as Agents)
Re:
Applications under Articles 278 and 279 TFEU requesting, in Case T-163/20 R, suspension of the operation of the Parliament’s decision of 24 March 2020 informing the applicant that its tender for public contract COMM/DG/AWD/2019/854 had not been accepted and that the contract had been awarded to another tenderer; and that the General Court order the Parliament to produce the tender analysis report and, in Case T-163/20 R II, suspension of the operation of the Parliament’s decision of 17 April 2020 informing the applicant that its tender for public contract COMM/DG/AWD/2019/854 had been rejected on the ground that it did not fulfil the selection criteria relating to financial and economic standing.
Operative part of the order
|
1. |
Operation of the European Parliament’s decision of 24 March 2020 informing Isopix SA that its tender for public contract COMM/DG/AWD/2019/854 had not been accepted and that the contract had been awarded to another tenderer is suspended. |
|
2. |
The Parliament shall provide Isopix with a copy of the non-confidential version of the tender analysis report. |
|
3. |
The application for interim relief in Case T-163/20 R II is dismissed as inadmissible. |
|
4. |
The orders of 3 April 2020, Isopix v Parliament (T-163/20 R), and of 22 April 2020, Isopix v Parliament (T-163/20 R II) are rescinded. |
|
5. |
Costs are reserved. |