This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62020TB0136
Case T-136/20: Order of the General Court of 11 November 2021 — Ardex v EUIPO — Chen (ArtiX PAINTS) (EU trade mark — Revocation of the contested decision — Action which has become devoid of purpose — No need to adjudicate)
Case T-136/20: Order of the General Court of 11 November 2021 — Ardex v EUIPO — Chen (ArtiX PAINTS) (EU trade mark — Revocation of the contested decision — Action which has become devoid of purpose — No need to adjudicate)
Case T-136/20: Order of the General Court of 11 November 2021 — Ardex v EUIPO — Chen (ArtiX PAINTS) (EU trade mark — Revocation of the contested decision — Action which has become devoid of purpose — No need to adjudicate)
IO C 24, 17.1.2022, p. 36–37
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
17.1.2022 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 24/36 |
Order of the General Court of 11 November 2021 — Ardex v EUIPO — Chen (ArtiX PAINTS)
(Case T-136/20) (1)
(EU trade mark - Revocation of the contested decision - Action which has become devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate)
(2022/C 24/48)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Ardex GmbH (Witten, Germany) (represented by: C. Becker, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: S. Palmero Cabezas, acting as Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Lian Chen (Seseña Nuevo, Spain) (represented by: A. González López-Menchero and V. Valero Piña, lawyers)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 18 November 2019 (Case R 2503/2018-2), relating to opposition proceedings between Ardex and Mr Chen.
Operative part of the order
|
1. |
There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action. |
|
2. |
The European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) is ordered to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Ardex GmbH and Mr Lian Chen. |