EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62019TA0851
Case T-851/19: Judgment of the General Court of 15 October 2020 — Body Attack Sports Nutrition v EUIPO — Sakkari (SAKKATTACK) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU figurative mark SAKKATTACK — Earlier international word marks ATTACK and Body Attack and earlier international figurative mark Body Attack SPORTS NUTRITION — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
Case T-851/19: Judgment of the General Court of 15 October 2020 — Body Attack Sports Nutrition v EUIPO — Sakkari (SAKKATTACK) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU figurative mark SAKKATTACK — Earlier international word marks ATTACK and Body Attack and earlier international figurative mark Body Attack SPORTS NUTRITION — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
Case T-851/19: Judgment of the General Court of 15 October 2020 — Body Attack Sports Nutrition v EUIPO — Sakkari (SAKKATTACK) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU figurative mark SAKKATTACK — Earlier international word marks ATTACK and Body Attack and earlier international figurative mark Body Attack SPORTS NUTRITION — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
IO C 433, 14.12.2020, p. 48–49
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
14.12.2020 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 433/48 |
Judgment of the General Court of 15 October 2020 — Body Attack Sports Nutrition v EUIPO — Sakkari (SAKKATTACK)
(Case T-851/19) (1)
(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU figurative mark SAKKATTACK - Earlier international word marks ATTACK and Body Attack and earlier international figurative mark Body Attack SPORTS NUTRITION - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
(2020/C 433/61)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Body Attack Sports Nutrition GmbH & Co. KG (Hamburg, Germany) (represented by: S. Labesius, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: J. Crespo Carrillo and V. Ruzek, acting as Agents)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Maria Sakkari (Nicosia, Cyprus) (represented by: M. Nikolaraki, lawyer)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 14 October 2019 (Case R 2560/2018-4), relating to opposition proceedings between Body Attack Sports Nutrition and Ms Sakkari.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
|
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
|
2. |
Orders Body Attack Sports Nutrition GmbH & Co. KG to pay the costs. |