Back to EUR-Lex homepage

EUR-Lex Access to European Union law

Back to EUR-Lex homepage

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search
You are here

Document 62019TA0607

Case T-607/19: Judgment of the General Court of 15 October 2020 — Itinerant Show Room v EUIPO (FAKE DUCK) (EU trade mark — Application for EU figurative mark FAKE DUCK — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptiveness — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Principles of equal treatment and legality)

IO C 433, 14.12.2020, p. 46–46 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

14.12.2020   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 433/46

Judgment of the General Court of 15 October 2020 — Itinerant Show Room v EUIPO (FAKE DUCK)

(Case T-607/19) (1)

(EU trade mark - Application for EU figurative mark FAKE DUCK - Absolute ground for refusal - Descriptiveness - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Principles of equal treatment and legality)

(2020/C 433/57)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Itinerant Show Room (San Giorgio in Bosco, Italy) (represented by: E. Montelione, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: M. Capostagno, acting as Agent)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 1 July 2019 (Case R 830/2019-2) concerning an application for registration of the figurative sign FAKE DUCK as an EU trade mark.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1.

Dismisses the action;

2.

Orders Itinerant Show Room Srl to pay the costs.

(1)  OJ C 372, 4.11.2019.

Top