This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62018TA0608
Case T-608/18: Judgment of the General Court of 10 June 2020 — Sammut v Parliament (Civil service — Officials — Rights and obligations of officials — Publication of a matter dealing with the work of the European Union — Obligation to provide information in advance — Article 17a of the Staff Regulations — Staff report — Liability)
Case T-608/18: Judgment of the General Court of 10 June 2020 — Sammut v Parliament (Civil service — Officials — Rights and obligations of officials — Publication of a matter dealing with the work of the European Union — Obligation to provide information in advance — Article 17a of the Staff Regulations — Staff report — Liability)
Case T-608/18: Judgment of the General Court of 10 June 2020 — Sammut v Parliament (Civil service — Officials — Rights and obligations of officials — Publication of a matter dealing with the work of the European Union — Obligation to provide information in advance — Article 17a of the Staff Regulations — Staff report — Liability)
IO C 247, 27.7.2020, p. 8–9
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
27.7.2020 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 247/8 |
Judgment of the General Court of 10 June 2020 — Sammut v Parliament
(Case T-608/18) (1)
(Civil service - Officials - Rights and obligations of officials - Publication of a matter dealing with the work of the European Union - Obligation to provide information in advance - Article 17a of the Staff Regulations - Staff report - Liability)
(2020/C 247/13)
Language of the case: Maltese
Parties
Applicant: Mark Anthony Sammut (Foetz, Luxembourg) (represented by: P. Borg Olivier, lawyer)
Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: M. Sammut and I. Lázaro Betancor, acting as Agents)
Re:
Application based on Article 270 TFEU seeking, in essence, (i) annulment of the decision of the Parliament of 4 January 2018 in so far as it did not grant the applicant’s request that an assessment made in his staff report for 2016 be removed and (ii) compensation for the material and non-material damage that he allegedly suffered as a result of that decision.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
|
1. |
Dismisses the action. |
|
2. |
Orders Mark Anthony Sammut to pay the costs. |