EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62017TB0298
Case T-298/17: Order of the General Court of 18 April 2018 — Iordăchescu and Others v Parliament and Others (Action for annulment — Directive 2014/40/EU — Approximation of laws — Manufacture, presentation and sale of tobacco products and related products — Period allowed for commencing proceedings — Delay — Claim for damages — Application initiating proceedings — Disregard of the procedural requirements — Inadmissibility — Lack of jurisdiction)
Case T-298/17: Order of the General Court of 18 April 2018 — Iordăchescu and Others v Parliament and Others (Action for annulment — Directive 2014/40/EU — Approximation of laws — Manufacture, presentation and sale of tobacco products and related products — Period allowed for commencing proceedings — Delay — Claim for damages — Application initiating proceedings — Disregard of the procedural requirements — Inadmissibility — Lack of jurisdiction)
Case T-298/17: Order of the General Court of 18 April 2018 — Iordăchescu and Others v Parliament and Others (Action for annulment — Directive 2014/40/EU — Approximation of laws — Manufacture, presentation and sale of tobacco products and related products — Period allowed for commencing proceedings — Delay — Claim for damages — Application initiating proceedings — Disregard of the procedural requirements — Inadmissibility — Lack of jurisdiction)
IO C 221, 25.6.2018, p. 26–27
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
Case T-298/17: Order of the General Court of 18 April 2018 — Iordăchescu and Others v Parliament and Others (Action for annulment — Directive 2014/40/EU — Approximation of laws — Manufacture, presentation and sale of tobacco products and related products — Period allowed for commencing proceedings — Delay — Claim for damages — Application initiating proceedings — Disregard of the procedural requirements — Inadmissibility — Lack of jurisdiction)
Order of the General Court of 18 April 2018 — Iordăchescu and Others v Parliament and Others
(Case T-298/17) ( 1 )
‛(Action for annulment — Directive 2014/40/EU — Approximation of laws — Manufacture, presentation and sale of tobacco products and related products — Period allowed for commencing proceedings — Delay — Claim for damages — Application initiating proceedings — Disregard of the procedural requirements — Inadmissibility — Lack of jurisdiction)’
2018/C 221/32Language of the case: RomanianParties
Applicants: Adrian Iordăchescu (Bucharest, Romania), Florina Iordăchescu (Bucharest), Mihaela Iordăchescu (Bucharest) and Cristinel Iordăchescu (Bucharest) (represented by: A. Cuculis, lawyer)
Defendants: European Parliament (represented by: L. Visaggio and C. Ionescu Dima, acting as Agents), Council of the European Union (represented by: E. Karlsson and O. Segnana, acting as Agents) and European Commission (represented by: H. Stancu and J. Tomkin, acting as Agents)
Re:
First, application pursuant to Article 263 TFEU seeking the partial annulment of Directive 2014/40/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 3 April 2014 on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States concerning the manufacture, presentation and sale of tobacco and related products and repealing Directive 2001/37/EC (OJ 2014 L 127, p. 1) and, second, application pursuant to Article 268 TFEU for compensation for the harm which the applicants claim to have suffered.
Operative part of the order
1. |
The action is dismissed. |
2. |
Mr Adrian Iordăchescu, Ms Florina Iordăchescu, Ms Mihaela Iordăchescu and Mr Cristinel Iordăchescu shall pay the costs. |
( 1 ) OJ C 256, 7.8.2017.