Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62016TN0039

    Case T-39/16: Action brought on 25 January 2016 — Nanu-Nana Joachim Hoepp v OHIM — Fink (NANA FINK)

    IO C 106, 21.3.2016, p. 43–44 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    21.3.2016   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 106/43


    Action brought on 25 January 2016 — Nanu-Nana Joachim Hoepp v OHIM — Fink (NANA FINK)

    (Case T-39/16)

    (2016/C 106/51)

    Language in which the application was lodged: German

    Parties

    Applicant: Nanu-Nana Joachim Hoepp GmbH & Co. KG (Bremen, Germany) (represented by: T. Boddien, lawyer)

    Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

    Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Nadine Fink (Basle, Switzerland)

    Details of the proceedings before OHIM

    Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

    Trade mark at issue: International registration designating the European Union in respect of the figurative mark containing the word elements ‘NANA FINK’ — International registration designating the European Union No IR 1 111 651

    Procedure before OHIM: Opposition proceedings

    Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 12 November 2015 in Case R 679/2014-1

    Form of order sought

    The applicant claims that the Court should:

    annul the contested decision in opposition proceedings B 2 125 543 (International trade mark registration No IR 1 111 651);

    order OHIM to pay the costs.

    Plea in law

    Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.


    Top