EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62016TA0375
Case T-375/16: Judgment of the General Court of 18 May 2017 — Sabre GLBL v EUIPO (INSTASITE) (EU trade mark — Application for the EU word mark INSTASITE — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptiveness — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
Case T-375/16: Judgment of the General Court of 18 May 2017 — Sabre GLBL v EUIPO (INSTASITE) (EU trade mark — Application for the EU word mark INSTASITE — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptiveness — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
Case T-375/16: Judgment of the General Court of 18 May 2017 — Sabre GLBL v EUIPO (INSTASITE) (EU trade mark — Application for the EU word mark INSTASITE — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptiveness — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
IO C 221, 10.7.2017, p. 23–23
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
10.7.2017 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 221/23 |
Judgment of the General Court of 18 May 2017 — Sabre GLBL v EUIPO (INSTASITE)
(Case T-375/16) (1)
((EU trade mark - Application for the EU word mark INSTASITE - Absolute ground for refusal - Descriptiveness - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
(2017/C 221/31)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Sabre GLBL, Inc. (Southlake, Texas, United States) (represented by: J. Zecher, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Hanf and S. Crabbe, acting as Agents)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 27 April 2016 (Case R 1742/2015-2), relating to an application for registration of the word sign INSTASITE as an EU trade mark.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
|
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
|
2. |
Orders Sabre GLBL, Inc. to pay the costs. |