This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62016CN0272
Case C-272/16 P: Appeal brought on 12 May 2016 by Tayto Group Ltd against the judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) delivered on 24 February 2016 in Case T-816/14: Tayto Group v EUIPO — MIP Metro (REAL HAND COOKED)
Case C-272/16 P: Appeal brought on 12 May 2016 by Tayto Group Ltd against the judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) delivered on 24 February 2016 in Case T-816/14: Tayto Group v EUIPO — MIP Metro (REAL HAND COOKED)
Case C-272/16 P: Appeal brought on 12 May 2016 by Tayto Group Ltd against the judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) delivered on 24 February 2016 in Case T-816/14: Tayto Group v EUIPO — MIP Metro (REAL HAND COOKED)
IO C 78, 13.3.2017, p. 6–6
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
13.3.2017 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 78/6 |
Appeal brought on 12 May 2016 by Tayto Group Ltd against the judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) delivered on 24 February 2016 in Case T-816/14: Tayto Group v EUIPO — MIP Metro (REAL HAND COOKED)
(Case C-272/16 P)
(2017/C 078/07)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Appellant: Tayto Group Ltd (represented by: R. Kunze, Solicitor, G. Würtenberger, Rechtsanwalt)
Other parties to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO), MIP Metro Group Intellectual Property GmbH & Co. KG
By order of 27 October 2016 the Court of Justice (Ninth Chamber) held that the appeal was inadmissible.