Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62016CA0105

    Case C-105/16 P: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 9 March 2017 — Poland v European Commission (Appeal — EAGGF and EAFRD — Expenditure excluded from EU financing — Rural Development — Regulation (EC) No 1257/1999 — Article 33b — Support for semi-subsistence farms undergoing restructuring — Obligation to spend at least 50 % of the support on restructuring operations)

    IO C 144, 8.5.2017, p. 13–13 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    8.5.2017   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 144/13


    Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 9 March 2017 — Poland v European Commission

    (Case C-105/16 P) (1)

    ((Appeal - EAGGF and EAFRD - Expenditure excluded from EU financing - Rural Development - Regulation (EC) No 1257/1999 - Article 33b - Support for semi-subsistence farms undergoing restructuring - Obligation to spend at least 50 % of the support on restructuring operations))

    (2017/C 144/17)

    Language of the case: Polish

    Parties

    Appellant: Republic of Poland (represented by: B. Majczyna, acting as Agent)

    Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: A. Stobiecka-Kuik and J. Aquilina, acting as Agents)

    Operative part of the judgment

    The Court:

    1.

    Dismisses the appeal;

    2.

    Orders the Republic of Poland to pay the costs.


    (1)  OJ C 136, 18.4.2016.


    Top