This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62015TN0364
Case T-364/15: Action brought on 4 July 2015 — ADR Center v Commission
Case T-364/15: Action brought on 4 July 2015 — ADR Center v Commission
Case T-364/15: Action brought on 4 July 2015 — ADR Center v Commission
IO C 302, 14.9.2015, p. 63–63
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
14.9.2015 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 302/63 |
Action brought on 4 July 2015 — ADR Center v Commission
(Case T-364/15)
(2015/C 302/78)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: ADR Center Srl (Rome, Italy) (represented by: L. Tantalo, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
|
— |
annul the Commission decision C (2015) 3117 final of 4 May 2015, |
|
— |
alternatively, declare eligible all the costs found inadmissible by the Commission, |
|
— |
order the defendants and any interveners to pay the applicant’s legal costs and expenses for this procedure in an amount to be determined equitably by the Court. |
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action, the applicant relies on four pleas in law.
|
1. |
First plea in law, alleging that the contested decision should be annulled on the ground that the Commission lacks the competence to adopt a recovery order in contractual matters. |
|
2. |
Second plea in law, alleging that the contested decision should be annulled on the ground that the decision relies on errors of fact and assessment. |
|
3. |
Third plea in law, alleging that the contested decision should be annulled on the ground that the Commission misused its power. |
|
4. |
Fourth plea in law, alleging that the contested decision should be annulled on the ground that the Commission breached their obligation to state reasons. |