This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62014TN0557
Case T-557/14: Action brought on 28 July 2014 — BrandGroup v OHIM — Brauerei S. Riegele, Inh. Riegele (SPEZOOMIX)
Case T-557/14: Action brought on 28 July 2014 — BrandGroup v OHIM — Brauerei S. Riegele, Inh. Riegele (SPEZOOMIX)
Case T-557/14: Action brought on 28 July 2014 — BrandGroup v OHIM — Brauerei S. Riegele, Inh. Riegele (SPEZOOMIX)
IO C 339, 29.9.2014, p. 25–25
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
29.9.2014 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 339/25 |
Action brought on 28 July 2014 — BrandGroup v OHIM — Brauerei S. Riegele, Inh. Riegele (SPEZOOMIX)
(Case T-557/14)
2014/C 339/30
Language in which the application was lodged: German
Parties
Applicant: BrandGroup GmbH (Bechtsrieth, Germany) (represented by: T. Raible, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Brauerei S. Riegele, Inh. Riegele KG (Augsburg, Germany)
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
|
— |
annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 15 May 2014 in Case R 941/2013-1; |
|
— |
order the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) and the Brauerei S. Riegele, Inh. Riegele KG to pay the costs. |
Pleas in law and main arguments
Applicant for a Community trade mark: BrandGroup GmbH
Community trade mark concerned: The word mark ‘SPEZOOMIX’ for goods in Classes 32 and 33 — Community trade mark application No 9 9 13 617
Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Brauerei S. Riegele, Inh. Riegele KG
Mark or sign cited in opposition: International and Community word marks ‘Spezi’, international and Community figurative marks containing the word ‘Spezi’, and the national word mark ‘Ein Spezi muß dabei sein’ for goods in Class 32
Decision of the Opposition Division: Rejection of the opposition
Decision of the Board of Appeal: Annulment of the decision of the Opposition Division and rejection in its entirety of the mark applied for
Plea in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) and Article 78(5) of Regulation No 207/2009