This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62014TN0318
Case T-318/14: Action brought on 2 May 2014 — Vinnolit v Commission
Case T-318/14: Action brought on 2 May 2014 — Vinnolit v Commission
Case T-318/14: Action brought on 2 May 2014 — Vinnolit v Commission
IO C 223, 14.7.2014, p. 61–62
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
14.7.2014 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 223/61 |
Action brought on 2 May 2014 — Vinnolit v Commission
(Case T-318/14)
2014/C 223/63
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: Vinnolit GmbH & Co. KG (Ismaning, Germany) (represented by: M. Geipel, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
— |
annul the decision of the European Commission of 18 December 2013 in cases SA.33995 (2013/C) (ex 2013/NN), in so far as it concerns the reduced EEG-surcharge for energy-intensive users; |
— |
order the defendant to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the applicant. |
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action, the applicant relies on five pleas in law.
1. |
First plea in law: No aid within the meaning of Article 107 TFEU
|
2. |
Second plea in law: In any event, no new aid
|
3. |
Third plea in law: Infringement of fundamental rights and the principle of proportionality
|
4. |
Fourth plea in law: Infringement of the principle of the protection of legitimate expectations
|
5. |
Fifth plea in law: Misuse of powers
|