EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62014TA0628
Case T-628/14: Judgment of the General Court of 3 December 2015 — Hewlett Packard Development Company v OHIM (FORTIFY) (Community trade mark — Application for Community word mark FORTIFY — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
Case T-628/14: Judgment of the General Court of 3 December 2015 — Hewlett Packard Development Company v OHIM (FORTIFY) (Community trade mark — Application for Community word mark FORTIFY — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
Case T-628/14: Judgment of the General Court of 3 December 2015 — Hewlett Packard Development Company v OHIM (FORTIFY) (Community trade mark — Application for Community word mark FORTIFY — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
IO C 27, 25.1.2016, p. 50–51
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
25.1.2016 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 27/50 |
Judgment of the General Court of 3 December 2015 — Hewlett Packard Development Company v OHIM (FORTIFY)
(Case T-628/14) (1)
((Community trade mark - Application for Community word mark FORTIFY - Absolute ground for refusal - Descriptive character - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
(2016/C 027/63)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Hewlett Packard Development Company LP (Dallas, Texas, United States) (represented by: T. Raab and H. Lauf, lawyers)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: L. Rampini, acting as Agent)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 3 June 2014 (Case R 249/2014-2), concerning an application for registration of the word sign FORTIFY as a Community trade mark.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
|
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
|
2. |
Orders Hewlett Packard Development Company LP to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM). |