This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62014FA0044
Case F-44/14: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 18 May 2015 — Pohjanmäki v Council (Civil service — Officials — Promotion — Consideration of comparative merits — Respective roles of the Appointing Authority and of the JCC — Absence of staff reports — Failure by members of the JCC to consult staff reports — Compatibility of the functions of the rapporteur with the JCC and of the former assessor — Manifest error of assessment — Seniority in grade — Level of responsibilities exercised — Duty of care)
Case F-44/14: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 18 May 2015 — Pohjanmäki v Council (Civil service — Officials — Promotion — Consideration of comparative merits — Respective roles of the Appointing Authority and of the JCC — Absence of staff reports — Failure by members of the JCC to consult staff reports — Compatibility of the functions of the rapporteur with the JCC and of the former assessor — Manifest error of assessment — Seniority in grade — Level of responsibilities exercised — Duty of care)
Case F-44/14: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 18 May 2015 — Pohjanmäki v Council (Civil service — Officials — Promotion — Consideration of comparative merits — Respective roles of the Appointing Authority and of the JCC — Absence of staff reports — Failure by members of the JCC to consult staff reports — Compatibility of the functions of the rapporteur with the JCC and of the former assessor — Manifest error of assessment — Seniority in grade — Level of responsibilities exercised — Duty of care)
IO C 213, 29.6.2015, p. 44–44
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
29.6.2015 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 213/44 |
Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 18 May 2015 — Pohjanmäki v Council
(Case F-44/14) (1)
((Civil service - Officials - Promotion - Consideration of comparative merits - Respective roles of the Appointing Authority and of the JCC - Absence of staff reports - Failure by members of the JCC to consult staff reports - Compatibility of the functions of the rapporteur with the JCC and of the former assessor - Manifest error of assessment - Seniority in grade - Level of responsibilities exercised - Duty of care))
(2015/C 213/71)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: Jaana Pohjanmäki (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: M. Velardo, lawyer)
Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Bauer, E. Rebasti and M. Veiga, acting as Agents)
Re:
The application, first, to annul the Council’s decision not to promote the applicant to grade AD 13 and, second, to award damages for the non-material harm allegedly suffered.
Operative part of the judgment
The Tribunal:
|
1) |
Dismisses the action; |
|
2) |
Declares that Ms Pohjanmäki is to bear half of her own costs; |
|
3) |
Declares that the Council of the European Union is to bear its own costs and to pay half of the costs incurred by Ms Pohjanmäki. |
(1) OJ C 212, 7/7/2014, p. 46.