EUR-Lex Access to European Union law

Back to EUR-Lex homepage

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62013CB0258

Case C-258/13: Order of the Court (Second Chamber) of 28 November 2013 (request for a preliminary ruling from the 5 a Vara Cível de Lisboa — Portugal) — Sociedade Agrícola e Imobiliária da Quinta de S. Paio Lda v Instituto da Segurança Social IP (Request for a preliminary ruling  — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union  — Right to an effective remedy  — Legal persons pursuing a commercial objective  — Legal aid — No link with European Union law — Clear lack of jurisdiction of the Court)

IO C 102, 7.4.2014, p. 12–12 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

7.4.2014   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 102/12


Order of the Court (Second Chamber) of 28 November 2013 (request for a preliminary ruling from the 5a Vara Cível de Lisboa — Portugal) — Sociedade Agrícola e Imobiliária da Quinta de S. Paio Lda v Instituto da Segurança Social IP

(Case C-258/13) (1)

((Request for a preliminary ruling - Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - Right to an effective remedy - Legal persons pursuing a commercial objective - Legal aid - No link with European Union law - Clear lack of jurisdiction of the Court))

2014/C 102/15

Language of the case: Portuguese

Referring court

5a Vara Cível de Lisboa

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Sociedade Agrícola e Imobiliária da Quinta de S. Paio Lda

Defendant: Instituto da Segurança Social IP

Re:

Request for a preliminary ruling — Varas Cíveis de Lisboa — Interpretation of Articles 6 and 267 TFEU and Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (OJ 2000 C 364, p. 1) — Right to an effective remedy — National legislation excluding legal persons pursuing a commercial objective from obtaining legal aid — Exemption from the legal charges applicable to those legal persons where they are insolvent or have entered into a composition with creditors.

Operative part of the order

The Court manifestly has no jurisdiction to rule on the questions referred for a preliminary ruling by the 5a Vara Cível de Lisboa (Portugal) in its decision of 13 March 2013 (Case C-258/13).


(1)  OJ C 215, 27.7.2013.


Top