EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62012TB0258
Case T-258/12: Order of the General Court of 2 July 2013 — Mederer v OHIM — Katjes Fassin (SOCCER GUMS) (Community trade mark — Opposition — Withdrawal of the opposition — No need to adjudicate)
Case T-258/12: Order of the General Court of 2 July 2013 — Mederer v OHIM — Katjes Fassin (SOCCER GUMS) (Community trade mark — Opposition — Withdrawal of the opposition — No need to adjudicate)
Case T-258/12: Order of the General Court of 2 July 2013 — Mederer v OHIM — Katjes Fassin (SOCCER GUMS) (Community trade mark — Opposition — Withdrawal of the opposition — No need to adjudicate)
IO C 233, 10.8.2013, p. 10–10
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
IO C 233, 10.8.2013, p. 7–7
(HR)
|
10.8.2013 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 233/10 |
Order of the General Court of 2 July 2013 — Mederer v OHIM — Katjes Fassin (SOCCER GUMS)
(Case T-258/12) (1)
(Community trade mark - Opposition - Withdrawal of the opposition - No need to adjudicate)
2013/C 233/17
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: Mederer GmbH (Fürth, Germany) (represented by: O. Ruhl and C. Sachs, lawyers)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: G. Marten and R. Pethke, Agents)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the General Court: Katjes Fassin GmbH & Co. KG (Emmerich am Rhein, Germany) (represented by: T. Schmitz and C. Osterrieth, lawyers)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 10 April 2012 (Case R 225/2011-4) relating to opposition proceedings between Mederer GmbH and Katjes Fassin GmbH & Co. KG.
Operative part of the order
|
1. |
There is no need to adjudicate on the action. |
|
2. |
The applicant and the intervener shall bear their own costs and shall each pay half of the costs incurred by the defendant. |