Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62011CN0619

    Case C-619/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal du travail de Bruxelles (Belgium) of 30 November 2011 — Patricia Dumont de Chassart v ONAFTS — Office national des allocations familiales pour travailleurs salariés

    IO C 49, 18.2.2012, p. 16–17 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    18.2.2012   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 49/16


    Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal du travail de Bruxelles (Belgium) of 30 November 2011 — Patricia Dumont de Chassart v ONAFTS — Office national des allocations familiales pour travailleurs salariés

    (Case C-619/11)

    2012/C 49/27

    Language of the case: French

    Referring court

    Tribunal du travail de Bruxelles

    Parties to the main proceedings

    Applicant: Patricia Dumont de Chassart

    Defendant: ONAFTS — Office national des allocations familiales pour travailleurs salariés

    Question referred

    Does Article 79(1) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 of 14 June 1971 on the application of social security schemes to employed persons, to self-employed persons and to members of their families moving within the Community (1) breach the general principles of equality and non-discrimination, enshrined, inter alia, in Article 14 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, signed at Rome on 4 November 1950, read, where appropriate, in conjunction with Articles 17, 39 and/or 43 of the consolidated version of the Treaty establishing the European Community, when it is interpreted as allowing the rules equating periods of insurance, employment or self-employment laid down in Article 72 of Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 of 14 June 1971 on the application of social security schemes to employed persons, to self-employed persons and to members of their families moving within the Community to apply to the deceased parent alone with the consequence that Article 56bis(1) of the Laws on Family Allowances consolidated on 19 December 1939 excludes, in the case of the surviving parent, irrespective of that parent’s nationality provided he or she is a national of a Member State or provided he or she comes within the scope ratione personae of Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 of 14 June 1971 on the application of social security schemes to employed persons, to self-employed persons and to members of their families moving within the Community, who has worked in another country of the European Union during the 12-month period referred to in Article 56bis(1) of the Laws on Family Allowances consolidated on 19 December 1939, the opportunity for that parent to provide evidence that he or she fulfils the condition that, in his or her capacity as claimant for the purposes of Article 51(3)(1) of the Laws on Family Allowances consolidated on 19 December 1939, he or she could have received six flat-rate monthly benefit payments during the 12 months preceding the death, whereas the surviving parent, whether he or she is of Belgian nationality or is a national of another Member State of the European Union, who has worked exclusively in Belgium during the 12-month period referred to in Article 56bis(1) of the Laws on Family Allowances consolidated on 19 December 1939, in some cases because he or she has never left Belgian territory, is allowed to adduce such evidence?


    (1)  OJ, English Special Edition 1971(II), p. 416.


    Top