EUR-Lex Access to European Union law

Back to EUR-Lex homepage

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62010TN0143

Case T-143/10: Action brought on 30 March 2010 — Ben Ri Electrónica v OHIM — Sacopa (LT LIGHT-THECNO)

IO C 134, 22.5.2010, p. 48–49 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

22.5.2010   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 134/48


Action brought on 30 March 2010 — Ben Ri Electrónica v OHIM — Sacopa (LT LIGHT-THECNO)

(Case T-143/10)

2010/C 134/78

Language in which the application was lodged: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Ben Ri Electrónica SA (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: A. Alejos Cutuli, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Sacopa SAU (Sant Jaume de Llierca (Girona), Spain)

Form of order sought

annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM and reject Community mark No 4 520 193;

order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: Sacopa SAU

Community trade mark concerned: Figurative mark which contains the word element ‘LT’ (Application No 4 520 193) for goods in Classes 7, 9 and 11.

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The Applicant.

Mark or sign cited in opposition: Community figurative mark (No 13 375) and Spanish figurative marks (Nos 1 719 729 and 1 719 730) composed of the juxtaposition of and ‘L’ and a ‘T’ superimposed on a circle for goods in Classes 9 and 11.

Decision of the Opposition Division: Partial rejection of the opposition.

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Annulment of the contested decision and rejection of the opposition.

Pleas in law: Incorrect interpretation of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 on the Community trade mark.


Top