This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62008TA0187
Case T-187/08: Judgment of the General Court of 20 April 2010 — Rodd & Gunn Australia v OHIM (Representation of a dog) (Community trade mark — Figurative Community trade mark representing a dog — Cancellation of the mark upon expiry of the registration — Request for renewal of the mark — Application for restitutio in integrum — Article 78 of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 81 of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
Case T-187/08: Judgment of the General Court of 20 April 2010 — Rodd & Gunn Australia v OHIM (Representation of a dog) (Community trade mark — Figurative Community trade mark representing a dog — Cancellation of the mark upon expiry of the registration — Request for renewal of the mark — Application for restitutio in integrum — Article 78 of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 81 of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
Case T-187/08: Judgment of the General Court of 20 April 2010 — Rodd & Gunn Australia v OHIM (Representation of a dog) (Community trade mark — Figurative Community trade mark representing a dog — Cancellation of the mark upon expiry of the registration — Request for renewal of the mark — Application for restitutio in integrum — Article 78 of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 81 of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
IO C 148, 5.6.2010, p. 27–27
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
5.6.2010 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 148/27 |
Judgment of the General Court of 20 April 2010 — Rodd & Gunn Australia v OHIM (Representation of a dog)
(Case T-187/08) (1)
(Community trade mark - Figurative Community trade mark representing a dog - Cancellation of the mark upon expiry of the registration - Request for renewal of the mark - Application for restitutio in integrum - Article 78 of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 81 of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
2010/C 148/47
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Rodd & Gunn Australia Ltd (Wellington, New Zealand) (represented by: B. Brandreth, Barrister, and N. Jenkins, Solicitor)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (represented by: Ó. Mondéjar Ortuño, acting as Agent)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 12 March 2008 (Case R 1245/2007-4) relating to an application for restitutio in integrum.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
|
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
|
2. |
Orders Rodd & Gunn Australia Ltd to pay the costs. |