Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62008TA0109

    Case T-109/08: Judgment of the General Court of 27 April 2010 — Freixenet v OHIM (Shape of a frosted white bottle) (Community trade mark — Application for a Community trade mark representing a frosted white bottle — Absolute ground for refusal — Lack of distinctive character — No distinctive character acquired through use — Article 7(1)(b) and 7(3) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(b) and 7(3) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) — Obligation to state reasons — Rights of the defence — Article 73 of Regulation No 40/94 (now Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009))

    IO C 161, 19.6.2010, p. 39–40 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    19.6.2010   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 161/39


    Judgment of the General Court of 27 April 2010 — Freixenet v OHIM (Shape of a frosted white bottle)

    (Case T-109/08) (1)

    (Community trade mark - Application for a Community trade mark representing a frosted white bottle - Absolute ground for refusal - Lack of distinctive character - No distinctive character acquired through use - Article 7(1)(b) and 7(3) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(b) and 7(3) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) - Obligation to state reasons - Rights of the defence - Article 73 of Regulation No 40/94 (now Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009))

    (2010/C 161/60)

    Language of the case: French

    Parties

    Applicant: Freixenet, SA (Sant Sadurní d’Anoia, Spain) (represented by: F. de Visscher, E. Cornu and D. Moreau, lawyers)

    Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral, Agent)

    Re:

    Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 30 November 2007 (Case R 97/2001-1) concerning an application for registration of a sign representing a frosted white bottle as a Community trade mark.

    Operative part of the judgment

    The Court:

    1.

    Dismisses the action;

    2.

    Orders Freixenet, SA to pay the costs.


    (1)  OJ C 116, 9.5.2008.


    Top