Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62007TA0110

Case T-110/07: Judgment of the General Court of 3 March 2011 — Siemens v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Market in gas insulated switchgear projects — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement — Market sharing — Effects within the common market — Concept of continuous infringement — Duration of the infringement — Limitation period — Fines — Proportionality — Aggravating circumstances — Role of leader — Mitigating circumstances — Cooperation)

IO C 113, 9.4.2011, p. 10–10 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

9.4.2011   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 113/10


Judgment of the General Court of 3 March 2011 — Siemens v Commission

(Case T-110/07) (1)

(Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - Market in gas insulated switchgear projects - Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement - Market sharing - Effects within the common market - Concept of continuous infringement - Duration of the infringement - Limitation period - Fines - Proportionality - Aggravating circumstances - Role of leader - Mitigating circumstances - Cooperation)

2011/C 113/19

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Siemens (Berlin and Munich, Germany) (represented: initially by I. Brinker, T. Loest and C. Steinle, and subsequently by I. Brinker and C. Steinle, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented: initially by F. Arbault and O. Weber, and subsequently by X. Lewis and R. Sauer, and lastly by R. Sauer and A. Antoniadis, Agents)

Re:

Partial annulment of Commission Decision C(2006) 6762 final of 24 January 2007 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 EC and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/F/38.899 — Gas insulated switchgear) and, in the alternative, a reduction in the amount of fine imposed on the applicant.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1.

Dismisses the application;

2.

Orders Siemens to pay the costs.


(1)  OJ C 140, 23.6.2007.


Top