Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62006TA0325

    Case T-325/06: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 10 September 2008 — Boston Scientific Ltd v OHIM — Terumo (CAPIO) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark CAPIO — Earlier national word mark CAPIOX — Relative ground for refusal — Genuine use of the mark — Article 43(1) and (2) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 40/94)

    IO C 272, 25.10.2008, p. 23–23 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    25.10.2008   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 272/23


    Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 10 September 2008 — Boston Scientific Ltd v OHIM — Terumo (CAPIO)

    (Case T-325/06) (1)

    (Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark CAPIO - Earlier national word mark CAPIOX - Relative ground for refusal - Genuine use of the mark - Article 43(1) and (2) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 40/94)

    (2008/C 272/43)

    Language of the case: English

    Parties

    Applicant: Boston Scientific Ltd (Hastings, Barbados) (represented by: P. Rath and W. Festl-Wietek, lawyers)

    Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral, acting as Agent)

    Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM and intervener before the Court of First Instance: Terumo Kabushiki Kaisha (Tokyo, Japan) (represented by: C. Bercial Arias, lawyer)

    Re:

    Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 14 September 2006 (Case R 61/2006-2), relating to opposition proceedings between Terumo Kabushiki Kaisha and Boston Scientific Ltd.

    Operative part of the judgment

    The Court:

    1.

    Dismisses the action.

    2.

    Orders Boston Scientific Ltd to pay the costs.


    (1)  OJ C 326, 30.12.2006.


    Top