Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62006TA0103

    Case T-103/06: Judgment of the General Court of 13 April 2010 — Esotrade v OHIM — Segura Sánchez (YoKaNa) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community figurative mark YoKaNa — Earlier Community and national figurative marks YOKONO — Relative grounds for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

    IO C 148, 5.6.2010, p. 26–26 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    5.6.2010   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 148/26


    Judgment of the General Court of 13 April 2010 — Esotrade v OHIM — Segura Sánchez (YoKaNa)

    (Case T-103/06) (1)

    (Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community figurative mark YoKaNa - Earlier Community and national figurative marks YOKONO - Relative grounds for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Similarity of the signs - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

    2010/C 148/45

    Language of the case: Spanish

    Parties

    Applicant: Esotrade SA (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: J. de Rivera Lamo de Espinosa and J.E. Astiz Suárez, lawyers)

    Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: J. García Murillo and O. Montalto, acting as Agents)

    Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the General Court: Antonio Segura Sánchez (Alicante, Spain)

    Re:

    Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 10 January 2006 (Case R 217/2004-2), concerning opposition proceedings between Antonio Segura Sánchez and Esotrade SA.

    Operative part of the judgment

    The Court:

    1.

    Dismisses the action;

    2.

    Orders the applicant to pay the costs.


    (1)  OJ C 121, 20.5.2006.


    Top