Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62000TB0218

    Case T-218/00: Order of the General Court of 22 January 2013 — Cooperativa Mare Azzurro and Others v Commission (Action for annulment — State aid — Relief from social security contributions for firms in Venice and Chioggia — Decision declaring the aid scheme to be incompatible with the common market and requiring the recovery of aid paid — Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

    IO C 71, 9.3.2013, p. 18–18 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    9.3.2013   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 71/18


    Order of the General Court of 22 January 2013 — Cooperativa Mare Azzurro and Others v Commission

    (Case T-218/00) (1)

    (Action for annulment - State aid - Relief from social security contributions for firms in Venice and Chioggia - Decision declaring the aid scheme to be incompatible with the common market and requiring the recovery of aid paid - Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

    2013/C 71/28

    Language of the case: Italian

    Parties

    Applicants: Cooperativa Mare Azzurro Soc. coop. rl (Chioggia, Italy); Cooperativa vongolari Sottomarina Lido Soc. coop. rl (Chioggia) (represented initially by: G. Boscolo, and subsequently by A. Boscolo, lawyers); and Ghezzo Giovanni & C. Snc di Ghezzo Maurizio & C. (Venice, Italy) (represented by: R. Volpe and C. Montagner, lawyers)

    Defendant: European Commission (represented by: V. Di Bucci, Agent, assisted by A. Dal Ferro, lawyer)

    Re:

    Application for annulment of Commission Decision 2000/394/EC of 25 November 1999 on aid to firms in Venice and Chioggia by way of relief from social security contributions under Laws Nos 30/1997 and 206/1995 (OJ 2000 L 150, p. 50).

    Operative part of the order

    1.

    The objection of inadmissibility raised by the European Commission is joined to the substance;

    2.

    The action is dismissed as being, in part, manifestly inadmissible and, in part, manifestly lacking any foundation in law;

    3.

    Cooperativa Mare Azzurro Soc. coop. rl, Cooperativa vongolari Sottomarina Lido Soc. coop. rl and Ghezzo Giovanni & C. Snc di Ghezzo Maurizio & C. are to bear the Commission’s costs in addition to their own costs.


    (1)  OJ C 302, 21.10.2000.


    Top