Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62020CO0437

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 10 January 2022.
Criminal proceedings against ZI and TQ.
Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) Rules of Procedure of the Court – Games of chance – Licences for the collection of bets – Extension of existing licences – Regularisation of data transmission centres (DTC) engaged in the collection of bets without the necessary licence and police authorisation – Limited period – Manifest inadmissibility of the reference for a preliminary ruling.
Case C-437/20.

Court reports – general – 'Information on unpublished decisions' section

ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:2022:53

 Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 10 January 2022 – ZI and TQ

(Case C‑437/20)

( Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) Rules of Procedure of the Court – Games of chance – Licences for the collection of bets – Extension of existing licences – Regularisation of data transmission centres (DTC) engaged in the collection of bets without the necessary licence and police authorisation – Limited period – Manifest inadmissibility of the reference for a preliminary ruling)

1. 

Questions referred for a preliminary ruling – Admissibility – Questions referred lacking sufficient information regarding the legislative context and the reasons justifying the need for an answer to the questions referred for a preliminary ruling – Impossibility for the Court to determine the applicability and relevance of the provisions of EU law relied on – Manifest inadmissibility

(Art. 267 TFEU; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 23; Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Arts 53(2) and 94(b) and (c))

(see paras 18-21, 25-27, 31, operative part)

2. 

Questions referred for a preliminary ruling – Admissibility – Questions referred without sufficient information on the factual and legislative context – Questions submitted in a context which precludes a useful answer – Manifest inadmissibility

(Art. 267 TFEU; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 23; Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Arts 53(2) and 94(a) and (b))

(see paras 29, 30)

Operative part

The request for a preliminary ruling by the Tribunale di Parma (Parma District Court, Italy), by decision of 8 November 2019, is manifestly inadmissible.

Top