Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62024TO0443

Order of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 17 July 2025.
ECE Group GmbH & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark ECE LOGISTICS – International registration designating the European Union of the earlier figurative mark ECE – Earlier EU word mark ECE – Earlier national word mark ECE Logistics – Relative ground for invalidity – No likelihood of confusion – No similarity between the goods and services – Article 8(1)(b) and Article 53(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.
Case T-443/24.

ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2025:739

 Order of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 17 July 2025 –
ECE Group v EUIPO – ECE Logistics (ECE LOGISTICS)

(Case T‑443/24)

(EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark ECE LOGISTICS – International registration designating the European Union of the earlier figurative mark ECE – Earlier EU word mark ECE – Earlier national word mark ECE Logistics – Relative ground for invalidity – No likelihood of confusion – No similarity between the goods and services – Article 8(1)(b) and Article 53(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

1. 

EU trade mark – Procedural provisions – Statement of reasons for decisions – First sentence of Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Scope identical to that of Article 296 TFEU – Recourse by the Board of Appeal to implicit reasoning – Whether permissible – Conditions

(Art. 296 TFEU; European Parliament and Council Directive 2017/1001, Art. 94(1), first sentence)

(see paragraphs 20-23)

2. 

EU trade mark – Procedural provisions – Examination of the facts of EUIPO’s own motion – Invalidity proceedings concerning relative grounds for refusal – Examination restricted to the facts, evidence and arguments provided

(Council Regulation No 207/2009, Arts 52 and 55)

(see paragraph 43)

3. 

EU trade mark – Surrender, revocation and invalidity – Relative grounds for invalidity – Existence of an identical or similar earlier mark registered in respect of identical or similar goods or services – Likelihood of confusion with the earlier mark – Criteria for assessment

(Council Regulation No 207/2009, Arts 8(1)(b) and 52(1)(a))

(see paragraphs 45, 46)

4. 

EU trade mark – Surrender, revocation and invalidity – Relative grounds for invalidity – Existence of an identical or similar earlier mark registered in respect of identical or similar goods or services – Similarity between the goods or services concerned – Criteria for assessment – Complementary nature of the goods or services

(Council Regulation No 207/2009, Arts 8(1)(b) and 52(1)(a))

(see paragraphs 47, 55, 56, 58)

5. 

EU trade mark – Surrender, revocation and invalidity – Relative grounds for invalidity – Existence of an identical or similar earlier mark registered in respect of identical or similar goods or services – Figurative mark ECE LOGISTICS and word mark ECE Logistics

(Council Regulation No 207/2009, Arts 8(1)(b) and 52(1)(a))

(see paragraphs 52, 54, 61)

Operative part

1. 

The action is dismissed.

2. 

ECE Group GmbH & Co. KG shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by ECE Logistics sp. z o.o.

3. 

The European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) shall bear its own costs.

Top