Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62018CO0118(02)

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 13 December 2018.
Hochmann Marketing GmbH.
Application for interpretation — Inadmissibility.
Case C-118/18 P-INT.

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 13 December 2018 — Hochmann Marketing GmbH v EUIPO

(Case C‑118/18 P-INT)

(Application for interpretation — Inadmissibility)

Judicial proceedings — Interpretation of a judgment — Conditions for the admissibility thereof

(Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 43; Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Art. 158(1))

(see paras 8, 15, 16)

Operative part

1. 

The appeal is dismissed as being, in part, manifestly inadmissible and, in part, manifestly unfounded.

2. 

Hochmann Marketing GmbH shall bear its own costs.

Top